Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Outzen: How BP Secretly Buys PR
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
ED in Pensacola
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:35 AM
To: Charles Wood
Subject: Weekly Economic Development Investor Update
Please note, this is an email that I send directly to you and I encourage any feedback or questions by replying to this email which is the result of a renewed effort to push information out about our economic development efforts here at the Pensacola Bay Area Chamber of Commerce. The information included is not considered confidential and can be forwarded to other individuals that may be interested in our efforts.
• One of Two – Over the last year, the Pensacola and Panama City MSAs are the only two metros that had positive job growth in the period from March 2009 to March 2010. While unemployment levels are still very high, this is definitely a good sign for Pensacola and possibly a sign that Northwest Florida may emerge from the recession before the rest of the state. See the map at: http://www.labormarketinfo.com/library/maps/ces/jobgrowth.asp?growthtype=p&series=00000000
• Project Activity – Our activity levels continue to climb. The back office and call center sectors have been the most active, in fact we have submitted on four different projects in the last two weeks for projects that range between 200 and 400 jobs. Additionally, mid size manufacturing projects are picking up as well generally in the range of 50 to 100 employees.
• Recruitment Trip – I attended CORENET last week as part of our recruitment efforts. CORENET is a membership organization of corporate real estate executives that manage real estate for public and private companies as well as large national real estate groups. The highlight of the meeting was a dinner hosted by the Florida Business Development Fund (of which the Chamber is a member along with Tampa, Jacksonville and a few other large EDOs) that hosted 18 corporate real estate execs from around the country.
• Final Plat for Tech Campus - The City Council approved the final plat for the tech campus last Thursday allowing PBS&J to complete the engineering documents and submit to the City and the US Economic Development Administration for final approval – this means that most of our major hurdles are behind us including the $2 million EDA grant award, the archeological dig, and now the platting process…
Recent Success: Synergy Solutions of Phoenix, Arizona has announced that they will locate a back office support center in Pensacola, creating 200 jobs in downtown.
Charles Wood, CEcD
Senior Vice President - Economic Development
Pensacola Bay Area Chamber of Commerce
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Recession and Florida
by Dr. C. C. Elebash
The economic recession that began in 2008 is having a profound impact on state and local governments. The effect is more pronounced in Florida than in most states. This is not a short-term problem.
What happened? The underlying causes of the severe downturn were:
The United States consumed more than it produced. We are a highly productive nation, but consumption exceeded national output. We bought more from abroad than we sold abroad. This created large trade deficits which the U.S. financed by borrowing from other nations.
Credit became too easy. Congress encouraged banks to make risky loans, especially home loans. Federal and state regulatory agencies failed to foresee the consequences of this folly – or knew the dangers but still failed to curb excesses.
Easy credit produced a real estate boom that collapsed in 2007. When the “bubble” burst, developers could not pay off construction loans, and many property owners could not make their mortgage payments. Investors took big losses on “toxic” securities based on so-called “sub-prime” mortgages. The strain on our financial system spread around the world.
What now? The Federal government should keep spending! Yes, the Federal government has to keep spending. (It pains me to write this.) The recession continues because personal consumption remains low. Many workers have lost their jobs. Those who are employed are saving as much as they can and spending as little as they can. The economy may have a relapse unless Federal outlays continue to supplement private spending.
We will not have a real recovery until consumer confidence returns. The Federal government cannot address long-term imbalances until consumers spend more, banks lend more and businesses increase capital investment.
What about Florida? Almost all state and local governments face a period of weak revenues. Unlike the national government, states cannot “print money”. With few exceptions, states cannot borrow money to pay operating expenses.
The outlook for Florida government revenues is grim. Population growth and new construction were the basis of Florida’s economy and tax structure for over 50 years. That era is over.
The state depends heavily on the sales tax, and retail sales growth is weak. Federal stimulus funds may not last indefinitely. The State budget problem will not ease up anytime soon. Florida will not fully recover until a new state economy evolves.
Public education in Florida is under severe pressure. The “day of reckoning” has arrived for the K-12 class size constitutional amendment, and it is arriving at a time of financial crisis. Community colleges and universities are making painful adjustments in the face of smaller appropriations and resistance to tuition hikes.
Although municipal bankruptcies have been rare, they are now a real possibility. Local governments in Florida will be in a financial squeeze for more than just a couple of years. They rely on property taxes to a large extent, and property values are severely depressed. Little improvement is in sight for real estate. Counties and cities cannot expect the State to “bail them out” if they over commit financially, and angry citizens will balk at new local taxes.
Summing up. We are in the early phases of recovery, but improvement will be slow and uncertain. Neither Florida nor the U.S. will pick up from where we left off in 2007. There will be a new economic framework, the outline of which is not yet clear. Florida can no longer depend on in-migration to fuel our economy. Our state government will struggle financially and so will our local governments.
The ingenuity and productivity of this nation will eventually prevail. Better times will then return. Meanwhile: “Hold on to your seats!” It will be a long and bumpy ride.
(The author is a retired UWF finance professor and a Chartered Financial Analyst.)
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Thursday, February 4, 2010
DeWeese hits home run with beautification initiative
Please notice that I have added Pensacola Citywide Beautification to my blogroll. This is a site developed and maintained by Councilmember Maren DeWeese (District 3). It shows beautification efforts that have been done, opportunities for you to participate, and how to start your own beautification project.
While I'd love to hear from you on this endeavor, I ask that you coordinate through Maren. She has the plan and the connections for a volunteer labor pool.
Labels: beautification, city council, maren deweese, pensacola, sam hall
Monday, December 14, 2009
P.C.: we didn't go to hell with the referendum
From C.C. Elebash on the port
Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:03 PM
Subject: New Council port policy
To: ">" List
City Council port discussion – December 14, 2009
The City Council Enterprise Committee port discussion this afternoon was a perfect example of why we need an elected executive mayor.
Council endorsed a “pie in the sky” port proposal from City Staff without seeking independent expert advice or inviting dissenting views. City Staff has an ambitious port agenda with few details and no money.
Council acted in the face of a disturbingly poor year for the port – only 10 ships and record low tonnage.
Today’s session illustrates the existing City Hall “culture”. A strong Staff dominates a weak and cumbersome Council.
(Committee Chairman P, C. Wu twice alluded to the dangers of the new City Charter. He apparently has not accepted the will of the voters.)
C. C. Elebash
C.C. is right. The Council answers to the whim of the press and the minority who expresses an opinion, but the Mayor will have to run on his or her vision and be held accountable for decision or indecision. Ms. Mack came out bold for selling the port but has caved to criticism. To be fair, her proposal was too bold and the alternative offered by staff offers an out as a transition plan. [Note: The staff plan is for mixed use while in transition.]
But what we need is a decisive plan from an elected leader that can be voted on up or down by the Council: The Mayor's Plan OR the Council's Plan, if indeed, it even has one.
Indeed, this post is about Pensacola having a clear plan for what is arguably the single most valuable waterfront property in the City of Pensacola....whether that plan is one you agree with or not. Once a plan is adopted, then we should put all the wherewithal of the City behind its implementation.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
It's Pensacola Wins! (and District 2 helped)
The historic vote to change Pensacola's form of government passed with 55.2% of the vote. District 2 contributed with 52.4% with a relatively high turnout in an off-election.
Labels: city charter, pensacola, sam hall



